Philadelphia Workers’ Compensation Law Firm

Publications

May 2011

Pennsylvania Bar Institute; “Tough Problems in Workers’ Compensation – 2011: Claims for Fatal (Death) Benefits”

November, 2007

Lorman Education Services; “The 4 Common Injuries and Mental Stress Claims in Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation”

October 2006

Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association; “Dissecting and Defending IRE Reports and Other Post Gardner Issues-Case Law Update, Legal Issues and Strategies”

May 2005

Philadelphia Bar Reporter; “Commonwealth Court Addresses Workers’ Compensation Section”

Dec. 2001

The Legal Intelligencer, Vol. 225, No. 116; “Medical Reports Inadmissible Despite Act 57 Allowance: Evidence on Claims Exceeding 52 Weeks is Deemed Hearsay”

Nov. 2001

The Legal Intelligencer, Vol. 225, No. 93; “Palliative Physical Therapy is Deemed Reasonable and Necessary Treatment According to Commonwealth Court”

Oct. 2001

The Legal Intelligencer, Vol. 225, No. 72: “Pennsylvania Supreme Court Clarifies ‘Discovery Rule’ of Workers’ Compensation Act Notice Provision”

Sept. 2001

The Legal Intelligencer, Vol. 225, No. 52: “Key in Reinstatement Positions: Aggravation vs. Recurrence – Burden of Proof Issues”

July 2001

The Legal Intelligencer, Vol. 225, No. 8: “Workers’ Compensation Subrogation Liens Inapplicable in ADA Claims: Separate Causes of Action Do Not Entail Double Recovery”

June 2001

The Legal Intelligencer, Vol. 224, No. 115: “Workers’ Compensation Subrogation Liens are No Longer Absolute”

May 2001

The Legal Intelligencer, Vol. 224, No. 91: “Commonwealth Court Decision in American Belt Sparks Controversy Over Child Labor Law”

April 2001

The Legal Intelligencer, Vol. 224, No. 71: “Courts Address Statute of Limitations Involving Petitions to Reinstate Benefits: Injured Workers Have Three Years After Partial Disability Expires”

March 2001

The Legal Intelligencer, Vol. P.1711: “Workers’ Compensation Carrier Required to Pay Full Amount of Subrogation Lien Asserted by Separate Third Party Health Insurance Plan in Excess of Cost Containment Provision of Act 44”

Feb. 2001

The Legal Intelligencer, Vol. P943: “Supreme Court Considers Burden of Proof for Reinstatement Petitions Following Layoff While Under Suspension of Benefits”